![]() The support is pretty decent as well, usually responding within 1-2 business days. So you can buy a 4 and a 2 camera license and activate both to get 6 cameras. I'm running 6 cameras right now with a license for 8 (plan on adding more in the future). Runs even better via a docker on unraid then it did in Ubuntu (headless) on the same prefer Xeoma because of the Linux support. Thanks updating this quick and responding to my issues on github promptly. Specifically resource management in a Linux system, some pretty nice workflow set ups, and I get less false alarms now. So to answer your question, it's better at some things than Blue iris. Blue iris also charged for one of it's major updates if I remember correctly a few versions back. The updates are included for 1-3 years depending what you purchase. I'm planning to pick up my 4th camera this week, then I'll have to decide what I want to do about licensing. In other words, for my specific scenario, it just works better. I also have a huge decrease in ram utilization. I liked it but I literraly air at 1% cpu usage with Xeoma in idle. However blue iris in a VM was less than ideal. I only purchased a 4 camera license, so my cost wasn't much different from blue iris, though I do own both. I just went to Xeoma's website, and its more costly than Blue Iris, plus I have to *buy* updates after a period of time? OK. I realize this probably isn't the proper thread for asking this, so forgive me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |